|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The use of the adverb suffix -mente was characteristic for pieces of young Chopin. In the main text, we include the proofreading – probably by Chopin – in FE (→EE). In EE, in addition, the older, obsolete form simplice was replaced with its contemporary counterpart semplice. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The later start of the slur could have been introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1 (→FE→EE) – cf. other motifs of this theme with identical rhythm, e.g. in bars 3 and 25. However, in the main text we start the slur from the 1st note of the bar, in accordance with A, since the authenticity of the version of GE1 is uncertain. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1 |
|||||||||||
|
b. 4-28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing pedalling in bars 4 and 28 seems to be an inaccuracy of notation. In the first two bars, Chopin characteristically diversifies the performance – with or without pedal – depending on whether the crotchets creating a spread chord can be held with hand or not. It is possible that he considered the use of the same pedalling two bars further to be obvious (cf. the adjacent note). In the recapitulation (bars 325-336), respective bars appear twice (bars 328 and 336), both times with pedalling. The category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 4-28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In bars 4, 12 and 28 there are no slurs in the part of the L.H. in A. These are the same bars in which pedalling signs are missing. While writing the fourth, last bar of the accompaniment based on alternating use of two schemes, Chopin could have already been thinking about the next bar, structured differently. In GE1 (→FE) slurs were added in bars 12 and 28, in both cases repeating a slur used two bars earlier (in particular in bar 12 the erroneous slur from bar 10 was repeated). According to us, it indicates an action of the reviser. In EE and GE2 a slur was added also in bar 4, whereas in GE2 the slur in bar 12 was corrected. We give the last version in the main text, since the absence of slurs in the discussed bars must be an inaccuracy of notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
raising e
2 to e2 is absent. It is difficult to explain this oversight other than by haste. The mistake was corrected already in 
in bar 12 in 
in bar 12 in 
